Language for learning in mathematics is very different from language for learning in science. Mathematicians themselves seem to have a different language within each respective discipline.
To say that music teachers have a language that is transferrable to other content areas doesn't make sense either. What does make sense, is learning language in many more than one content area - our example of a person who did this is Da Vinci.
Language for learning is not dabbling in language rhetoric that makes a neophite sound like a sage. It is getting into the language of a discipline and then recognizing that everything is language for learning. Transfer, well that is important, too, but I'll talk about that in another post.
Good night.
To say that music teachers have a language that is transferrable to other content areas doesn't make sense either. What does make sense, is learning language in many more than one content area - our example of a person who did this is Da Vinci.
Language for learning is not dabbling in language rhetoric that makes a neophite sound like a sage. It is getting into the language of a discipline and then recognizing that everything is language for learning. Transfer, well that is important, too, but I'll talk about that in another post.
Good night.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.